Utrum verum et simplex convertantur. The Simplicity of God in Aquinas and Swinburne


  • Christian Tapp University of Innsbruck




This paper explores Thomas Aquinas’ and Richard Swinburne’s doctrines of simplicity in the context of their philosophical theologies. Both say that God is simple. However, Swinburne takes simplicity as a property of the theistic hypothesis, while for Aquinas simplicity is a property of God himself. For Swinburne, simpler theories are ceteris paribus more likely to be true; for Aquinas, simplicity and truth are properties of God which, in a certain way, coincide – because God is metaphysically simple. Notwithstanding their different approaches, some unreckoned parallels between their thoughts are brought to light.


Aquinas. De Potentia.

—. Expositio libri Posteriorum Analyticorum.

—. Summa contra Gentiles.

—. Summa Theologiæ.

—. Super De Trinitate.

—. Super Ioannem.

—. Super Libri de causis.

Aristotle. Analytica posteriora.

—, Analytica priora.

—, De Interpretatione.

—, Peri Hermeneias.

—, Physica.

Baker, Alan. 2016. “Simplicity”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ..

Boethius, De consolatione philosophiæ.

Burns, Robert M. 1989. “The Divine Simplicity in St Thomas”. Religious Studies 25, no. 03: 271–293. doi:10.1017/S0034412500019855.

Craig, William L. 1991. Divine foreknowledge and Human Freedom: The Coherence of Theism: Omniscience. Leiden: Brill.

Egenter, Robert. 2009. “Einfachheit”. In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, edited by Walter Kasper and Michael Buchberger. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.

Geach, Peter T. 1973. “Omnipotence”. Philosophy 48, no. 183: 7–20. doi:10.1017/S0031819100060381.

Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary S. Rosenkrantz. 2010. “Omnipotence”. In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper and Philip L. Quinn, 243–50. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hughes, Christopher. 1989. On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas’ Philosophical Theology. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.

—. 2018. “Aquinas on the Nature and Implications of Divine Simplicity”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, no. 2: 1–23. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.2553.

Hughes, Gerard J. 1999. “Towards a Rehabilitation of Aquinas’s ‚Third Way’”. In The Rationality of Theism, edited by Godehard Brüntrup and Ronald K. Tacelli. Boston Mass: Kluwer Acad. Publ.

Kenny, Anthony. 1979. “The Definition of Omnipotence”. In The God of the Philosophers, edited by Anthony Kenny. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Kretzmann, Norman. 1997. The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa contra gentiles I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Moonan, Lawrence. 1998. “Omnipotence”. In Philosophy of religion: A Guide to the Subject, edited by Brian Davies, 80–86. London: Cassell.

Pike, Nelson. 1965. “Divine Omniscience and Voluntary Action”. The Philosophical Review 74, no. 1: 27–46. doi:10.2307/2183529.

Quine, Willard van Orman. 1981. Theories and Things. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

Savage, C. W. 1967. “The Paradox of the Stone”. The Philosophical Review 76, no. 1: 74–79. doi:10.2307/2183529.

Schärtl-Trendl, Thomas. 2018. “Divine Simplicity”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, no. 2: 53–90. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.2554.

Smart, John J. C. 1984. “Ockham’s Razor”. In Principles of Philosophical Reasoning, edited by James H. Fetzer, 118–28. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld.

Swinburne, Richard. 1979. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

—. 1993. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

—. 1997. Simplicity as Evidence of Truth. Milwaukee: Marquette Univ. Press.

—. 2001. Epistemic Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

—. 2008. Was Jesus God? Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Tapp, Christian. 2015. “Eine versteckte Endlichkeitsannahme in Thomas’ tertia via”. Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 137, no. 1: 104–16.

—. 2016. “Philosophische Gotteserkenntnis nach Thomas von Aquin”. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 123, no. 2: 441–57.

—. 2016. “Infinity in Aquinas’ Doctrine of God”. In Analytically Oriented Thomism, edited by Mirosław Szatkowski, 93–115. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid: editiones scholasticae.

Thorburn, W. M. 1918. “The Myth of Occam’s Razor”. Mind XXVII, no. 3: 345–53. doi:10.1093/mind/XXVII.3.345.

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1991. “Divine Simplicity”. Philosophical Perspectives 5: 531–52. doi:10.2307/2214108.

Zagzebski, Linda T. 1991. The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.



How to Cite

Tapp, Christian. 2018. “Utrum Verum Et Simplex Convertantur. The Simplicity of God in Aquinas and Swinburne”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):23-50. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.2555.



Research Articles