Aquinas, Geach, and existence


  • Damiano Costa University of Italian Switzerland



Aquinas, existence, God's foreknowledge, future contingents, being


Aquinas’ theory of being has received a growing amount of attention from contemporary scholars, both from a historic and a philosophical point of view. An important source of this attention is Geach’s seminal Form and Existence. In it, Geach argues that Aquinas subscribes to (i) a tensed notion of existence and (ii) a theory of time according to which past and future entities do not exist in act. Subsequent commentators, such as Kenny in his Aquinas on Being, have agreed with Geach on both points. In this paper, I argue that in several passages of his corpus, most notably those in which he is concerned with God’s knowledge of future contingents, Aquinas implicitly subscribes to a theory of being and time according to which: (i) past and future entities are attributed existence in act, (ii) there is theoretical need for introducing a tenseless notion of existence.


Aquinas. 1856. Scriptum Super Sententiis. Edited by Roberto Busa. Parma:

—. 1920. Summa Theologica. second and revised edition. Edited by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Oates and Washbourne.

—. 1947. Compendium Theologiae. St. Louis, MO: B. Herder Book Co.

—. 1953. De Veritate, q. 14. Edited by J. V. McGlynn. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company.

—. 1962. Expositio libri Peryermeneias: Aristotle on Interpretation. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette Univ. Press.

—. 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Univ. Press.

Brock, Stephen. 2007. “Thomas Aquinas and “What Actually Exists””. In Wisdom’s Apprentice: Thomistic Essays in Honor of Lawrence Dewan, O.P, edited by Lawrence Dewan and Peter A. Kwasniewski, 13–39. Washington, D.C.: Catholic Univ. of America Press.

Correia, Fabrice, and Sven Rosenkranz. 2019. “Temporal existence and temporal location”. Philosophical Studies 57: 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01295-z.

Craig, William L. 1985. “Was Thomas Aquinas a B-Theorist of Time?”. New Scholasticism 59, no. 4: 475–83. doi:10.5840/newscholas19855946.

—. 1988. The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez. Leiden: Brill.

Cross, Richard. 1997. “Duns Scotus on Eternity and Timelessness”. Faith and Philosophy 14, no. 1: 3–25.

Fabro, Cornelio. 1956. “Per la semantica originaria dello “esse” tomistico”. Euntes docete 9: 437–56.

Geach, Peter T. 1955. “Form and Existence”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55, no. 1: 251–72. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.251.

—. 1961. “Aquinas”. In Three Philosophers: Aristotle, Aquinas, Frege, edited by Elizabeth Anscombe and Peter T. Geach. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.

—. 1977. Providence and Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Geach, Peter T., and Robert H. Stoothoff. 1968. “What Actually Exists”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 42, no. 1: 7–30. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/42.1.7.

Gili, Luca, and Lorenz Demey. 2017. “Thomas van Aquino, niet-normale modale logica’s en het probleem van toekomstige contingenties”. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 79, no. 2: 259–76.

Gilson, Étienne. 1948. L’être et l’essence. Paris: Vrin.

Hughes, Christopher. 1989. On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas’ Philosophical Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.

—. 2015. Aquinas on Being, Goodness, and God. London: Routledge.

Kenny, Anthony. 2002. Aquinas on Being. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Lloyd, Genevieve. 1978. “Time and Existence”. Philosophy 53, no. 204: 215–28.

Miller, Barry. 1981. “Individuals Past, Present and Future”. Philosophy 56, no. 216: 253–57. doi:10.1017/S0031819100050105.

—. 1992. From Existence to God: A Contemporary Philosophical Argument. London: Routledge.

—. 2009. “Existence”. Last modified Fall 2009 Edition.

Mullins, Ryan T. 2016. The End of the Timeless God. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Nelson, Michael. 2012. “Existence”. Last modified Spring 2019 Edition.

Quine, W. V. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rogers, Katherin A. 2006. “Anselm on Eternity as the Fifth Dimension”. The Saint Anselm Journal 3, no. 2: 1–8.

Russell, Bertrand. 1903. Principles of Mathematics. London: Routledge.

Shanley, Brian J. 1997. “Eternal Knowledge of the Temporal in Aquinas”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71, no. 2: 197–224. doi:10.5840/acpq199771244.

Sider, Theodore. 2001. Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Clarendon.

Staley, Kevin. 2006. “Omniscience, Time and Eternity: Is Aquinas Inconsistent?” The Saint Anselm Journal 3, no. 2: 9–16.

Ventimiglia, Giovanni. 2012. To be o esse? La questione dell’essere nel tomismo analitico. Roma: Carocci.

—. 2018. “Aquinas on Being: One, Two or Three Senses of Being?”. Quaestio 18: 509–38. doi:10.1484/j.quaestio.5.118132.

—. 2018. “Is the Thomistic Doctrine of God as “Ipsum Esse Subsistens” Consistent?”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, no. 4: 161. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v10i4.2600.



How to Cite

Costa, Damiano. 2019. “Aquinas, Geach, and Existence”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (3):175-95.