Neoplatonic Pantheism Today
Neoplatonism is alive and well today. It expresses itself in New Thought and the mind-cure movements derived from it. However, to avoid many ancient errors, Neoplatonism needs to be modernized. The One is just the simple origin from which all complex things evolve. The Good, which is not the One, is the best of all possible propositions. A cosmological argument is given for the One and an ontological argument for the Good. The presence of the Good in every thing is Spirit. Spirit sits in the logical center of every body; it is surrounded by the regulatory forms of that body. Striving for the Good, Spirit seeks to correct the errors in its surrounding forms. To correct the errors in biological texts, modern Neoplatonists turn to the experimental method. This Neoplatonism is pantheistic not because of some theoretical definition of God but rather because of its practical focus on the shaping of Spirit.
Bishop, John. 2018. “A ‘naturalist’ Christian theism”. In Inter-Christian Philosophical Dialogues: Vol. 4, edited by Graham Oppy and Nick Trakakis, 3-24. London: Routledge.
Boolos, George. 1971. “The iterative conception of set”. In Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, edited by Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam, 486-502. 1996. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press, 486-502.
Bregman, Jay. 1990. “The Neoplatonic revival in North America”. Hermathena 149: 99-119.
Byrne, Rhonda. 2006. The Secret. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Cady, H. Emilie. 1895. Lessons in Truth: A Course of Twelve Lessons in Practical Christianity. Kansas City, MI: Unity School of Christianity.
Dawkins, Richard. 2003. A Devil’s Chaplain. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
—. 2008. The God Delusion. New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin.
Dillon, John. .2007. “Iamblichus’ defense of theurgy: Some reflections”. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1: 30-41.
—. 2016. “The divinizing of matter: Some reflections on Iamblichus’ theurgic approach to matter”. In Soul and Matter in Neoplatonism, edited by Jens Halfwasse, Tobias Dangel and Carl O’Brien, 177-88. Heidelberg: Univ. of Heidelberg Press.
Eddy, M. B. 1875. Science and Health. Boston, MA: Christian Scientist Publishing.
Gerson, L.P. 1994. Plotinus. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gilmore, C. S. 2003. “In defense of spatially related universals”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81, no 3: 420-8.
Harris, Sam. 2014. Waking Up. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Hartshorne, Charles. 1967. A Natural Theology for Our Time. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
—. 1984. Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press.
Hick, John. 1976. Death and Eternal Life. New York: Harper & Row.
Hill, Napoleon. 1936. Think and Grow Rich. Meriden, CT: The Ralston Society.
Holmes, Ernest. 1938. The Science of Mind. New York: Dodd Mead.
Jackson, B. D. 1967. “Plotinus and the Parmenides”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 5, no 4: 315-27.
Johnston, Sarah. 2008. “Animating statues: A case study in ritual”. Arethusa 41, no 3: 445-77.
Kull, Kalevi, Terrence Deacon, Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer, and Frederik Stjernfelt. 2009. “Theses on biosemiotics”. Biological Theory 4, no 2: 167-73.
Leibniz, G. W. 1697/1988. “On the ultimate origination of the universe”. In Leibniz: Monadology and Other Essays, edited by Paul Schrecker and Anne Marin. Schrecker. 1988. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing, 84-94.
Mamo, P. S. 1969. “Forms of individuals in the Enneads”. Phronesis 14, no 2: 77-96.
Mortley, Raoul. 1976. “Recent work on Neoplatonism”. Prudentia 7, no 1: 47-62.
Neff, Gina, and Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2018. Naturalism and Religion. London: Routledge.
Parfit, Derek. 1985. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Peale, Norman Vincent. 1952. The Power of Positive Thinking. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rist, John. 1963. “Forms of individuals in Plotinus”. The Classical Quarterly 13, no 2: 223-31.
Roberts, Seth. 2004. “Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: Ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 227-88.
Robertson, Donald. 2015. Stoicism and the Art of Happiness. New York: McGraw Hill.
Sallustius. 363. “On the gods and the world”. In Sallust: On the Gods and the World, T. Taylor (trans.), 1793. London: Edward Jeffery & Pall Mall.
Shanon, Benny. 2010. “The epistemics of ayahuasca visions”. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 9: 263-80.
Shaw, Gregory. 1985. “Theurgy: Rituals of unification in the Neoplatonism of Iamblichus”. Traditio 4: 1-28.
—. 1999. “Eros and Arithmos: Pythagorean theurgy in Iamblichus and Plotinus”. Ancient Philosophy 19: 121-43.
—. 2014. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press.
—. 2015. “Taking the shape of the gods: A theurgic reading of Hermetic rebirth”. Aries – Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism 15: 136-69.
Steinhart, Eric. 2014. Your Digital Afterlives: Computational Theories of Life after Death. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
—. 2018a. “Practices in religious naturalism”. In Routledge Handbook of Religious Naturalism, edited by Donald Crosby and Jerome Stone, 341-51. New York: Routledge.
—. 2018b. “Religion after naturalism”. In, Renewing Philosophy of Religion, edited by J. L. Schellenberg and Paul Draper, 63-78. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
—. 2018c. “Spirit”. Sophia 56, no 4: 557-71.
Sylvan, Robin. 2005. Trance Formation. New York, NY: Routledge.
Tillich, Paul. 1951. Systematic Theology: Vol. 1. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
—. 1957. Systematic Theology: Vol. 2. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.