Love That Takes Time: Pursuing Relationship in the Context of Hiddenness

Authors

  • Derek King University of St Andrews

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2021.3162

Keywords:

Hiddenness, Schellenberg, Love

Abstract

This paper offers a fresh strategy for responding to J.L. Schellenberg’s argument from divine hiddenness, called the dianthropic strategy. First, it shows how Schellenberg’s understanding of openness is deficient by arguing that openness to relationship is consistent with initial concealment. Then, the paper develops the dianthropic strategy, which focuses on the role of other persons in making a relationship between God and the nonbeliever more likely. It distinguishes this strategy from the responsibility argument and anticipates objections.

References

Blanchard, Joshua. 2016. “Heschel, Hiddenness, and the God of Israel”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8, no. 4: 109–24. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v8i4.1758.

Cottingham, John. 2002. “Descartes and the Voluntariness of Belief”. Monist 85, no. 3: 343–60. doi:10.5840/monist200285323.

Crummett, Dustin. 2015. ““We Are Here to Help Each Other”: Religious Community, Divine Hiddenness, and the Responsibility Argument”. Faith and Philosophy 32, no. 1: 45–62. doi:10.5840/faithphil20153428.

Cuneo, Terence. 2013. “Another Look at Divine Diddenness”. Religious Studies 49, no. 2: 151–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43658406.

Dumsday, Travis. 2010. “Divine Hiddenness and the Responsibility Argument”. Philosophia Christi 12, no. 2: 357–71. doi:10.5840/pc201012233.

Kinghorn, Kevin P. 2005. The Decision of Faith: Can Christian Beliefs be Freely Chosen? London: T & T Clark.

Moser, P. K. 2008. The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

— . 2017. The God Relationship: The Ethics for Inquiry about the Divine. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Murray, Michael. 2002. “Deus Absconditus”. In Divine Hiddenness: New Essays, edited by Daniel Howard-Snyder and P. K. Moser. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2016. “Silence, Evil, and Shusaku Endo”. In Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives, edited by Eleonore Stump and Adam Green. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

— . 2017. Maximal God: A New Defence of Perfect Being Theism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Pascal, Blaise. 1995. Pensées. London: Penguin.

Rea, Michael C. 2018. The Hiddenness of God. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Schellenberg, J.L. 2006. Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.

— . 2016. “Divine Hiddenness and Human Philosophy”. In Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives, edited by Eleonore Stump and Adam Green. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

— . 2017. The Hiddenness Argument: Philosophy’s New Challenge to Belief in God. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Stump, Eleonore. 2010. Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stump, Eleonore, and Adam Green, eds. 2016. Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Swinburne, Richard. 1998. Providence and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Tucker, Chris. 2008. “Divine Hiddenness and the Value of Divine-Creature Relationships”. Religious Studies 44, no. 3: 269–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27749959.

van Inwagen, Peter. 2006. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Wood, William D. 2013. Blaise Pascal on Duplicity, Sin, and the Fall: The Secret Instinct. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

King, Derek. 2021. “Love That Takes Time: Pursuing Relationship in the Context of Hiddenness”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (2):121-43. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2021.3162.

Issue

Section

Research Articles