What is God's Power?

Authors

  • Graham Renz Washington University in St. Louis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2021.3295

Abstract

Theists claim that God can make a causal difference in the world. That is, theists believe that God is causally efficacious, has power. Discussion of divine power has centered on understanding better the metaphysics of creation and sustenance, special intervention, governance, and providing an account of omnipotence consistent with other divine attributes, such as omnibenevolence. But little discussion has centered on what, deep down ontologically, God’s power is. I show that a number of prominent accounts of power fail to model what divine power could be, and then develop an account based on teleological and primitivist accounts of power.

References

Adams, Dani. 2018. “God and Dispositional Essentialism: An Account of the Laws of Nature”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99, no. 2: 293–316. doi:10.1111/papq.12162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12162

Adams, Sarah. 2015. “A New Paradox of Omnipotence”. Philosophia 43, no. 3: 759–85. doi:10.1007/s11406–015–9601-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9601-y

Armstrong, D. M. 1986. What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge Univ. Press.

— . 1989. A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility. Cambridge Univ. Press.

— . 1996. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge Univ. Press.

Bird, Alexander. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227013.001.0001

Choi, Sungho, and Michael Fara. 2018. “Dispositions”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dispositions/.

Clarke, W. N. 2001. The One and the Many: A Contemporary Thomistic Metaphysics. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Craig, William L. 2016. God Over All: Divine Aseity and the Challenge of Platonism. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198786887.001.0001

Davies, Brian. 2011. “The Limits of Language and the Notion of Analogy”. In The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, edited by Brian Davies and Eleonore Stump, 390–399. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195326093.003.0029

Doolan, Gregory T. 2011. Aquinas on the Divine Ideas as Exemplar Causes. Catholic Univ. of America Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt284wgq. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt284wgq

Dumsday, Travis. 2016. “Lowe’s Unorthodox Dispositionalism”. Res Philosophica 93, no. 1: 79–101. doi:10.11612/resphil.2016.93.1.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2016.93.1.7

Fine, Kit. 1994. “Essence and Modality”. Philosophical Perspectives 8: 1–16. doi:10.2307/2214160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2214160

Gasser, Georg, and Josef Quitterer. 2015. “The Power of God and Miracles”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 3: 247–66. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v7i3.114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v7i3.114

Gleeson, Andrew. 2010. “The Power of God”. Sophia 49, no. 4: 603–16. doi:10.1007/s11841–010–0166–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-010-0166-8

Göcke, Benedikt P. 2015. “Did God Do It? Metaphysical Models and Theological Hermeneutics”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78, no. 2: 215–31. doi:10.1007/s11153–014–9489–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9489-7

Handfield, Toby. 2005. “Armstrong and the Modal Inversion of Dispositions”. Philosophical Quarterly 55, no. 220: 452–61. doi:10.1111/j.0031–8094.2005.00410.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00410.x

Hannegan, William. 2016. “Hume, Dispositional Essentialism, and Where to Find the Idea of Necessary Connection”. Philosophia 44, no. 3: 787–91. doi:10.1007/s11406–016–9715-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9715-x

— . 2018. “Dispositional Essentialism, Directedness, and Inclination to an End”. Journal of Philosophical Research 43: 191–204. doi:10.5840/jpr2018828132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr2018828132

Heil, John. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199259747.001.0001

— . 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford Univ. Press.

— . 2012. The Universe as We Find It. Oxford Univ. Press.

— . 2015. “III — Aristotelian Supervenience”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115, no. 1pt1: 41–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9264.2015.00383.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2015.00383.x

Kroll, Nick. 2017. “Teleological Dispositions”. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10, 3–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198791973.003.0001

Lowe, E. J. 2005. The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199254397.001.0001

— . 2005. The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Clarendon Press.

— . 2010. “On the Individuation of Powers”. In The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, edited by Anna Marmodoro. Routledge.

— . 2018. “Metaphysics as the Science of Essence”. In Ontology, Modality, and Mind: Themes from the Metaphysics of E. J. Lowe, edited by Alexander Carruth, Sophie Gibb and John Heil, 14–34. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.

Marmodoro, Anna. 2016. “Dispositional Modality Vis-À-Vis Conditional Necessity”. Philosophical Investigations 39, no. 2: n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/phin.12125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12125

Martin, C. B. 2007. The Mind in Nature. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234103.001.0001

— . 2007. The Mind in Nature. Oxford Univ. Press.

Martin, C. B., and John Heil. 1999. “The Ontological Turn”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23, no. 1: 34–60. doi:10.1111/1475–4975.00003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4975.00003

Martin, C. B., and Karl Pfeifer. 1986. “Intentionality and the Non-Psychological”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46, no. 4: 531–54. doi:10.2307/2107668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2107668

McKitrick, J. 2003. “A Case for Extrinsic Dispositions”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81, no. 2: 155–74. doi:10.1080/713659629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713659629

McKitrick, Jennifer. 2018. Dispositional Pluralism. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198717805.001.0001

Mellor, D. H. 2000. “The Semantics and Ontology of Dispositions”. Mind 109, no. 436: 757–80. doi:10.1093/mind/109.436.757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/109.436.757

Molnar, Geroge. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Edited by Stephen Mumford. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.

Mumford, Stephen. 1999. “Intentionality and the Physical: A New Theory of Disposition Ascription”. Philosophical Quarterly 49, no. 195: 215–25. doi:10.1111/1467–9213.00138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00138

Mumford, Stephen, and Rani L. Anjum. 2011. Getting Causes From Powers. Oxford Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695614.001.0001

Oderberg, David S. 2011. “Essence and properties”. Erkenntnis 75, no. 1: 85–111. http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/24393/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9276-0

— . 2017. “Finality Revived: Powers and Intentionality”. Synthese 194, no. 7: 2387–2425. doi:10.1007/s11229–016–1057–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1057-5

Page, Ben. 2015. “The Dispositionalist Deity: How God Creates Laws and Why Theists Should Care”. Zygon 50, no. 1: 113–37. doi:10.1111/zygo.12150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12150

Panchuk, Michelle. 2016. “Created and Uncreated Things”. International Philosophical Quarterly 56, no. 1: 99–112. doi:10.5840/ipq201612855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq201612855

Panchuk, Michelle L. 2021. “The Simplicity of Divine Ideas: Theistic Conceptual Realism and The Doctrine of Divine Simplicity”. Religious Studies 57, no. 3. doi:10.1017/S0034412519000301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412519000301

Pearce, Kenneth. 2019. “Infinite Power and Finite Powers”. Univ. of Notre Dame Press. http://www.tara.tcd.ie/handle/2262/77482.

Perin, Casey. 2007. “Substantial Universals in Aristotle’s Categories”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 125–43.

Place, Ullin T. 1996. “Intentionality as the Mark of the Dispositional”. Dialectica 50, no. 2: 91–120. doi:10.1111/dltc.1996.50.issue-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1996.tb00001.x

Prior, Elizabeth, Robert Pargetter, and Frank Jackson. 1982. “Three Theses About Dispositions”. American Philosophical Quarterly 19, no. 3: 251–57.

Renz, Graham. forthcoming. “The Five-Category Ontology? E.J. Lowe and the Ontology of the Divine”. TheoLogica.

Ross, James F. 2008. Thought and World: The Hidden Necessities. Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Schrenk, Markus. 2010. “The Powerlessness of Necessity”. Noûs 44, no. 4: 725–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468–0068.2010.00755.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00755.x

Schultz, Walter J., and Lisanne D’Andrea-Winslow. 2017. “Causation, Dispositions, and Physical Occasionalism”. Zygon 52, no. 4: 962–83. doi:10.1111/zygo.12372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12372

Shoemaker, Sydney. 1980. “Causality and Properties”. In Time and Cause, edited by Peter van Inwagen, 109–35. D. Reidel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3528-5_7

Tugby, Michael. 2013. “Platonic Dispositionalism”. Mind 122, no. 486: 451–80. doi:10.1093/mind/fzt071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt071

van Inwagen, Peter. 2009. “God and Other Uncreated Things”. In Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump, edited by Kevin Timpe and Eleonore Stump. Routledge.

Vetter, Barbara. 2013. “Multi-Track Dispositions”. Philosophical Quarterly 63, no. 251: 330–52. doi:10.1111/1467–9213.12024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12024

— . 2015. Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality. Oxford Univ. Press.

Wahlberg, Tobias H. 2019. “Active Powers and Passive Powers — Do Causal Interactions Require Both?”. Philosophia 47, no. 5: 1603–12. doi:10.1007/s11406–019–00059–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00059-7

Whittle, Ann. 2009. “Causal Nominalism”. In Dispositions and Causes, edited by Toby Handfield, 242–285. Oxford Univ. Press, Clarendon Press.

— . 2016. “A Defense of Substance Causation”. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, no. 1: 1–20. doi:10.1017/apa.2016.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2016.1

Williams, Neil. 2014. “Powers: Necessity and Neighborhoods”. American Philosophical Quarterly 51, no. 4: 357–72.

Williams, Neil E. 2011. “Putting Powers Back on Multi-Track”. Philosophia 39, no. 3: 581–95. doi:10.1007/s11406–010–9293–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9293-2

— . 2019. The Powers Metaphysic. Oxford Univ. Press.

Published

2021-10-01

How to Cite

Renz, Graham. 2021. “What Is God’s Power?”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (3). https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2021.3295.

Issue

Section

Research Articles