Embracing Paradox: Maimonides and Kierkegaard on Divine Transcendence and Immanence

Authors

  • Nehama Verbin Tel Aviv University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v12i2.3313

Abstract

Negotiating the relation between divine transcendence and divine immanence lies at the heart of Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed and of Kierkegaard's philosophical works. The purpose of the paper is to explore the manners in which they do so. I argue that despite various differences between them, both engage with the tension between divine transcendence and immanence by turning away from objectivity to subjectivity and, moreover, by placing paradox, riddle and secret at the heart of their philosophical works. In other words, I argue that they do not attempt to solve or dissolve the great paradox of God's immanent transcendence but to present it in its most acute forms as the paradox within which the religious life is lived.

References

Benor, Ehud Z. 1995. “Meaning and Reference in Maimonides’ Negative Theology”. Harvard Theological Review 88, no. 3: 339–60.

Blumenthal, David R. 2006. Philosophic Mysticism: Studies in Rational Religion. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan Univ. Press.

Conant, James. 1993. “Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein and Nonsense”. In Pursuits of Reason: Essays in Honor of Stanley Cavell, edited by Stanley Cavell et al., 195–224. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech Univ. Press.

— . 1995. “Putting Two and Two Together: Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein and the Point of View for Their Work as Authors”. In Philosophy and the Grammar of Religious Belief, edited by Timothy Tessin and Mario von der Ruhr, 248–331. London: Macmillan.

Davies Daniel. 2011. Method and Metaphysics in Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Diamond, Cora. 1995. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Evans Stephen C. 1989. “Is Kierkegaard an Irrationalist? Reason, Paradox and Faith”. Religious Studies 25, no. 3: 347–62.

— . 2010. “Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript”. In Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide, edited by Rick A. Furtak, 204–18. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Even-Chen, Alexander. 2008. “Maimonides’ Theory of Positive Attributes [in Hebrew]”. Daat: A Journal of Jewish Philosophy and Kabbalah, no. 63: 19–45.

Ferreira, Jamie M. 1994. “The Point Outside the World: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Nonsense, Paradox and Religion”. Religious Studies 30, no. 1: 29–44.

Fox, Marvin. 1990. Interpreting Maimonides: Studies in Methodology, Metaphysics and Moral Philosophy. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Freudenthal, Gideon. 2009. “The Philosophical Mysticism of Maimonides”. In Maimonides and Mysticism, edited by A. Elqayam and D. Schwartz, 77–97. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan Univ. Press.

Gruenwald, Ithamar. 1991. “Maimonides’ Quest beyond Philosophy and Prophecy”. In The Complete Writings: Philosophical and Historical Studies, edited by Joel L. Kraemer, 141–57. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Guttman, Julius. 1964. Philosophies of Judaism: The History of Jewish Philosophy from Biblical Times to Franz Rosenzeig. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hyman, Arthur. 1988. “Interpreting Maimonides”. In Maimonides: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Joseph A. Buijs. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Kasher, Hanna. 1994. “Self-Cognizing Intellect and Negative Attributes in Maimonides’ Theology”. Harvard Theological Review 87, no. 4: 461–72.

Kierkegaard, Søren. 1983. Fear and Trembling. Edited by Howard V. Hong and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

— . 1985. Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Howard V. Hong and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

— . 1991. Practice in Christianity. Edited by Howard V. Hong and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

— . 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Howard V. Hong and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

— . 1995. Works of Love. Edited by Howard V. Hong and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

— . 1997. Christian Discourses and The Crisis and a Crisis in the Life of an Actress. Edited by Howard V. Hong and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

— . 2009. Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits. Edited by Howard V. Hong and Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

Law, David R. 2010. “The Existential Chalcedonian Christology of Kierkegaard’s Practice in Christianity”. Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook: 129–151. doi:10.1515/9783110223026.129.

Lorberbaum, Menachem. 2011. Dazzled by Beauty: Theology as Poetics in Hispanic Jewish Culture [In Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Ben Zvi Institute.

Lorberbaum, Yair. 2002. “On Contradictions, Rationality, Dialectics, and Esotericism in Maimonides’s Guide of the Perplexed”. The Review of Metaphysics 55, no. 4: 711–50.

Maimonides Moses. 1963. The Guide of the Perplexed. trans. Shlomo Pines. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.

McCallum, Donald. 2007. Maimonides’ Guide for the Perplexed: Silence and Salvation. London: Routledge.

Miller, Ed L. 1997. “At the Center of Kierkegaard: An Objective Absurdity”. Religious Studies 33, no. 4: 433–41.

Patt-Shamir, Galia. 2003. “To Live a Riddle: The Case of the Binding of Isaac”. Philosophy and Literature 27, no. 2: 269–83.

Quine, W. V. 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

Reines Alvin J. 1986. “Maimonides’ True Belief Concerning God: A Systematization”. In Maimonides and Philosophy, edited by Shlomo Pines and Yirmiahu Yovel, 24–35. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia. 2010. A Confusion of the Spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Seeskin, Kenneth. 2000. Searching for a Distant God: The Legacy of Maimonides. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Strauss, Leo. 1963. “How to Begin to Study the Guide of the Perplexed”. In Guide of the Perplexed, edited by Shlomo Pines. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.

— . 2013. “The Literary Character of the Guide of the Perplexed”. In Leo Strauss on Maimonides: The Complete Writings, edited by Kenneth H. Green, 341–98. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Verbin, N. 2011. “Wittgenstein and Maimonides on God and the Limits of Language”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3, no. 2: 68–87.

— . 2012. “Martyrdom: A Philosophical Perspective”. Philosophical Investigations 35, no. 1: 68–87.

— . 2016. “Moses Maimonides on Job’s Happiness and the Riddle of Divine Transcendence”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8, no. 4: 125–41.

— . 2017. “Three Knights of Faith on Job’s Suffering and its Defeat”. International Journal for Philosophy and Theology 78, no. 4–5: 382–95.

— . 2019. “Maimonides and Kierkegaard on Fictionalism, Divine Hiddenness and the Scope for Inter-Religious Dialogue”. In Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality, edited by Peter Jonkers and Oliver J. Wiertz, Chapter 5. London: Routledge.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1993. “Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough”. In Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, 119–55. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Verbin, Nehama. 2020. “Embracing Paradox: Maimonides and Kierkegaard on Divine Transcendence and Immanence”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (2):149-79. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v12i2.3313.