On the Compatibility of Evolutionary Biology and Theism


  • John Lemos McCabe Professor of Philosophy at Coe College in Cedar Rapids, IA




Human beings are the products of many thousands of years of biological evolution, and this process occurs in accordance with the principles of natural selection originally articulated and defended by Charles Darwin and developed and defended further in the modern synthesis of the 20th century.  In this paper, I consider how it may be thought that this fact threatens the rationality of belief in the Christian God.  These threats are countenanced with respect to issues of design, randomness, suffering, and the objectivity of ethics.  I argue that while some versions of Christian belief, such as those grounded in a literalist reading of the Genesis creation story or those committed to the image of God thesis, may be threatened by a Darwinian worldview, there are nonetheless plausible versions of Christian belief that are immune to Darwinian challenges.


Bloomfield, Paul. 2006. “Review: The Evolution of Morality”. Mind 116, no. 461: 176–80. doi:10.1093/mind/fzm176.

Dawkins, Richard. 1985. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design. London: W W Norton & Co Inc.

Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Doore, Gary. 1980. “The Argument From Design: Some Better Reasons for Agreeing with Hume”. Religious Studies 16, no. 2: 145–61. doi:10.1017/S0034412500012130.

Gallagher, Kenneth T. 1992. “Dawkins in Biomorph Land”. International Philosophical Quarterly 32, no. 4: 501–13. doi:10.5840/ipq199232440.

—. 1993. “Dawkins, Darwin, and Design”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67, no. 2: 233–46. doi:10.5840/acpq199367230.

Harris, Errol E. 1999. “Darwinism and God”. International Philosophical Quarterly 39, no. 3: 277–90. doi:10.5840/ipq199939324.

Joyce, Richard. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lemos, John. 2003. “Rachels on Darwinism and Theism”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77, no. 3: 399–415. doi:10.5840/acpq200377320.

—. 2008. Commonsense Darwinism: Evolution, Morality and Human Condition. La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.

Paley, William. [1802] 1819. Natural Theology. London: Rivington.

Rachels, James. 1990. Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Ruse, Michael. 1993. “The New Evolutionary Ethics”. In Evolutionary Ethics, edited by Mathew H. Nitecki and Doris V. Nitecki. Albany, NY: SUNY press.

—. 1998. Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy. Amherst, MA: Prometheus.

—. 2001. Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The Relationship between Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Sadowsky, James A. 1988. “Did Darwin Destroy the Design Argument?”. International Philosophical Quarterly 28, no. 1: 95–104. doi:10.5840/ipq198828146.

Swinburne, Richard. 1991. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.



How to Cite

Lemos, John. 2020. “On the Compatibility of Evolutionary Biology and Theism”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):23-39. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v12i3.3399.



Special Issue - Evolutionary Research on Morality and Theological Ethics