Secular Worldviews: Scientism and Secular Humanism

Authors

  • Mikael Stenmark Uppsala University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3640

Keywords:

worldview, secular humanism, naturalism, atheism, agnosticism

Abstract

In   this   essay,   I   maintain   that   although   atheism,   minimally   construed, consists simply of the belief that there is no God or gods, atheists must embrace a secular worldview of one kind or another. Since they cannot be without a worldview, atheists must develop an alternative to the religious, especially the theistic, worldviews which they, by implication, reject. Further, I argue that there are, at the very least, two options available to atheists and that these should not be conflated or treated as one and the same. The two options that I explore and distinguish are scientism and secular humanism. I also maintain that the things that might count as good grounds for or against secular or religious worldviews are shaped significantly by whether atheists embrace scientism or secular humanism.

Author Biography

Mikael Stenmark, Uppsala University

Professor of Philosophy of Religion

References

Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2017. “Naturalism and the Idea of Nature”. Philosophy 92, no. 3: 333–49. doi:10.1017/S0031819117000092

Carey, Jeremiah. 2018. “Spiritual but not Religious? On the Nature of Spirituality and Its relation to Religion”. International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 83, no. 3: 261–269. doi:10.1007/s11153–017–9648–8

De Caro, Mario and David Macarthur. 2004. “Introduction: The Nature of Naturalism”. Naturalism in Question, edited by Mario De Caro and David Macarthur. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

Dennett, Daniel C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Penguin Books.

Draper, Paul. 2002. “Seeking but not Believing: Confessions of a Practical Agnostic”. In Divine Hiddenness, edited by Daniel Howard-Snyder and Paul K. Moser. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 1999. Charles Darwin. Nora: Nya Doxa.

Franklin, William and Joseph M. Shaw. 1991. The Case for Christian Humanism. Mich., Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Gray, John. 2018. Seven Types of Atheism. London: Allen Lane.

Gutting, Gary. 2013. “Religious Agnosticism”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 37 no. 1: 51–67. doi:10.1111/misp.12002

Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Milton Keynes: Open Univ. Press.

Jackson, Frank. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

James, William. 1982 [1902]. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Penguin Books.

Kim, Jaegwon. 2003. “The American Origins of Philosophical Naturalism”. Journal of Philosophical Research, 28, Supplement. doi:10.5840/jpr200328Supplement28

Kitcher, Philip. 2011. “Challenges for Secularism”. In The Joy of Secularism, edited by George Levine. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

Law, Stephen. 2011. Humanism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

LeDrew, Stephen. 2012. “The Evolution of Atheism: Scientific and Humanistic Approaches”. History of the Human Sciences 25, no. 3: 70–87. doi:10.1177/0952695112441301

Oppy, Graham and N. N. Trakakis, 2009. “Late-Twentieth-Century Atheism”. Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Religion, edited by Graham Oppy and N. N. Trakakis. Durham: Acumen.

Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. 1965 [1488]. On the Dignity of Man. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Price, Huw. 2011. Naturalism without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Richard Dawkins, 2000. “Thoughts for the Millennium.” In Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia.

Rorty, Richard. 2007. “Main Statement by Richard Rorty”. In What’s the Use of Truth? edited by Richard Rorty and Pascal Engel. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

Rosenberg, Alex. 2011. The Atheist’s Guide to Reality. London: W.W. Norton & Company.

Rowe, William. 2010. “Friendly Atheism Revisited”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68, no. 1: 7–13. doi.org/10.1007/s11153–010–9257–2

Ruse, Michael. 2015. “Why I am an Accommodationist and Proud of It”. Zygon 50 no. 2: 361–375. doi:10.1111/zygo.12174

Scruton, Roger. 2015. “Scientism and the Humanities”. In Scientism: The New Orthodoxy, edited by Richard N. Williams and Daniel N. Robinson. London: Bloomsbury.

Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.

Sellars, Wilfrid. 1963. “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. In Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge.

Smart, Ninian. 1995. Worldviews. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Stenmark, Mikael. 1995. Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life. Notre Dame, Ind.: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Stenmark, Mikael. 2013. “Religious Naturalism and Its Rivals”. Religious Studies 49, no. 4: 529–550. doi:10.1017/S0034412512000431

Stenmark, Mikael. 2022. “Worldview Studies”. Religious Studies 58, no. 3: 564–582. doi:10.1017/S0034412521000135

Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press.

Thiessen, Joel and Sarah Wilkins-Laflamme. 2017. “Becoming a Religious None: Irreligious Socialization and Disaffiliation”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 56 no. 1: 64–82. doi:10.1111/jssr.12319

Vainio, Olli-Pekka and Aku Visula. 2015. “Varieties of Unbelief: A Taxonomy of Atheistic Positions”. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 57, no. 4: 483–500.

White, Curtis. 2013. The Science Delusion. Brooklyn, NY.: Melville House.

Wieseltier, Leon. 2013. “Crimes Against Humanities”. In New Republic, September 4. https://newrepublic.com/article/114548/leon-wieseltier-responds-steven-pinkers-scientism

Wilson, Edward O. 1999. Consilience. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Published

2022-12-16

How to Cite

Stenmark, Mikael. 2022. “Secular Worldviews: Scientism and Secular Humanism”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):237–264. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3640.

Issue

Section

Research Articles