Why Atheism has not Become a Subject of Philosophy of Religion


  • Vladimir Shokhin Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences




Ammon, Christoph F. v. Handbuch der christlichen Sittenlehre 1. Leipzig: Georg Joachim Göschen, 1823.

Coward, Harold G. Pluralism: Challenge to world religions. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1985.

Delcomminette, Sylvain. Le Philèbe de Platon: Introduction à l’agathologie platonicienne. Philosophia antiqua v. 100. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2006.

Edwards, Kathleen, ed. The complete C.S. Lewis Signature classics. New York: HarperOne, 2002.

Eisler, Rudolf, ed. Wörterbuch der philosophischen Begriffe: Historisch-quellenmäßig bearbeitet. 3. Aufl. Berlin: Mittler, 1910.

Flew, Antony G. N., and Roy A. Varghese. There is a God: How the world’s most notorious atheist changed his mind. San Francisco: Harper Collins, 2007.

Hick, John. An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. 2. print. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1989.

—. Dialogues in the philosophy of religion. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.

Kolodziejczyk, Sebastian T., and Janusz Salamon. Knowledge, Action, Pluralism: Contemporary Perspectives in Philosophy of Religion. Peter Lang 2014.

Linville, M. “The Moral Argument.” In The Blackwell companion to natural theology, ed. by William L. Craig and James P. Moreland, 391–448. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

Łukasiewicz, Dariusz. “Agathological Rationalism and First-Order Religions.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9, no. 2 (2017): 22–39. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v9i2.1944.

Newman, John H. An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent. London: Burns, Oates, and Co., 1870.

Oberhammer, Gerhard, ed. Inklusivismus: Eine indische Denkform. Wien, Leiden: Inst. für Indologie der Univ. Wien Sammlung De Nobili; Brill, 1983.

Rashdall, H. “The Moral Argument for Personal Immortality.” In King’s College lectures on immortality, ed. by J. F. Bethune-Baker and W. R. Matthews, 77–121. London: Univ. of London Press, 1920.

Salamon, Janusz. “Atheism and Agatheism in the Global Ethical Discourse: Reply to Millican and Thornhill-Miller.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 4 (2015): 197–245. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v7i4.94.

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Über die Religion: Reden an die Gebildeten unter ihren Verächtern. Berlin: Unger, 1799.

Shokhin, Vladimir K. Agathology: modernity and classics. Moskva: Kanon+, 2014.

—. “On Some Features of Buddhist Missionary Work and Double Standards in Religious Studies.” Studies in Interreligious Dialogue 15, no. 2 (2005): 133–54. doi:10.2143/SID.15.2.2004101.

Sorley, William R. Moral values and the idea of God. Gifford Lectures 1914/15. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1918.

Taylor, Alfred E. The Faith of a Moralist. Gifford Lectures 1926/1928. London: Macmillan, 1930.

Thornhill-Miller, Branden, and Peter Millican. “The Common-Core/Diversity Dilemma: Revisions of Humean thought, New Empirical Research, and the Limits of Rational Religious Belief.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 1 (2015): 1–49. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v7i1.128.

White, Nick. “Issues of consent in human-animal sexual relations.” https://njw.name/consent/.




How to Cite

Shokhin, Vladimir. 2017. “Why Atheism Has Not Become a Subject of Philosophy of Religion”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (3):65-80. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i3.1998.



Discussion and Replies