Divine Simplicity and the Grammar of God-talk: Comments on Hughes, Tapp, and Schärtl 


  • Otto Muck SJ University of Innsbruck




Different opinions about the simplicity of God may be connected with different understandings of how abstract terms are used to name the properties which are affirmed of a being. If these terms are taken to signify parts of that being, this being is not a simple one. Thomas Aquinas, who attributes essence, existence and perfections to God, nevertheless thinks that these are not different parts of God. When essence, existence and perfections are attributed to God, they all denominate the same, the Being of the first cause. For Aquinas, this is a consequence of his way of introducing the language about God by basing it upon the philosophical ways leading to God as first cause. Awareness of this connection between Divine attributes and the arguments for God’s existence is crucial for an adequate understanding of Aquinas’ position.


Thomas Aquinas, Summa contra gentiles

—. Summa Theologiæ

Coreth, Emerich. 1999. “Trinitätsdenken in neuzeitlicher Philosophie”. In Beiträge zur Christilichen Philosophie, edited by Christian Kanzian, 102–14. Innsbruck, Wien: Tyrolia.

Donat, Joseph. 1945. Theodicea. Heidelberg: Kerle.

Hughes, Christopher. 2018. “Aquinas on the Nature and Implications of Divine Simplicity”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, no. 2: 1–23. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.2553.

Löffler, Winfried. 2016. “Two Approaches to Divine Simplicity: Reply to Anthony Kenny and Christopher Hughes”. Giornale di Metafisica, no. 1: 157–64.

Muck, Otto. 1992. “Eigenschaften Gottes im Licht des Gödelschen Arguments”. Theologie und Philosophie 67: 60–85.

—. 1999. “Der Begriff der materia prima bei Thomas von Aquin und seine ontologischen Voraussetzungen.” In Otto Muck, Rationalität und Weltanschauung. Philosophische Untersuchungen, edited by Winfried Löffler, 381–99. Innsbruck, Wien: Tyrolia.

—. 2008. “Assumptions of Classical Arguments for the Existence of God”. In Proofs for the Existence of God: Contexts — Structures — Relevance, edited by Christian Kanzian and Hajj M. Legenhausen, 57–72. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.

—. 2014. “Grundlagen des Sprechens von Gottes Wirken im Leben von Menschen”. In Handeln Gottes: Beiträge zur aktuellen Debatte, edited by Roman Siebenrock and Christoph J. Amor, 105–31. Freiburg i. Br.: Herder.

Mullins, R. T. 2013. “Simply Impossible: A Case against Divine Simplicity”. Journal of Reformed Theology 7, no. 2: 181–203. doi:10.1163/15697312-12341294.

Schärtl, Thomas. 2018. “Divine Simplicity”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, no. 2: 53–91. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.2554.

Spencer, Mark K. 2017. “The Flexibility of Divine Simplicity”. International Philosophical Quarterly 57, no. 2: 123–39. doi:10.5840/ipq201731682.

Stump, Eleonore. 2012. “God’s Simplicity”. In The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, edited by Brian Davies and Eleonore Stump, 135–46. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Tapp, Christian. 2018. “Utrum verum et simplex convertantur: The simplicity of God in Aquinas and Swinburne”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, no. 2: 25–52. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.2555.



How to Cite

Muck SJ, Otto. 2018. “Divine Simplicity and the Grammar of God-Talk: Comments on Hughes, Tapp, and Schärtl ”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):89-104. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.2556.



Research Articles