Motivating the Search for Alternatives to Personal OmniGod Theism: The Case from Classical Theism
AbstractAnalytic philosophers of religion typically take God to be ‘the personal omniGod’ – a (supernatural, immaterial) person who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, and who creates and sustains all else that exists. Analytic philosophers also tend to assume that the personal omniGod is the God of ‘classical’ theism. Arguably, this is a mistake. To be consistent, a classical theist or her supporter must deny that God is literally a person. They need not, however, deny the aptness of using personal language, or of thinking of God as a person or personal at the level of religious psychology.
Adams, Marilyn M. 1999. Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press.
—. 2017. “A Modest Proposal? Caveat Emptor! Moral Theory and Problems of Evil”. In Ethics and the Problem of Evil, edited by James P. Sterba, 9-26. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Alston, William P. 1989. Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Ithaca:, NY Cornell Univ. Press.
Barth, Karl. 1936. Church Dogmatics. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
Bishop, John. 2007. “How a Modest Fideism may Constrain Theistic Commitments: Exploring an Alternative to Classical Theism”. Philosophia 35, no. 3-4: 387–402. doi:10.1007/s11406-007-9071-y.
Bishop, John, and Ken Perszyk. 2011. “The Normatively Relativised Logical Argument from Evil”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70, no. 2: 109–26. doi:10.1007/s11153-010-9282-1.
—. 2014. “Divine Action beyond the Personal OmniGod”, in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, vol. 5, edited by Jonathan Kvanvig, 1-21. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
—. 2016a. “Concepts of God and Problems of Evil”. In Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 106–27. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
—. 2016b. “A Euteleological Conception of Divinity and Divine Agency”, in Rethinking the Concept of a Personal God: Classical Theism, Personal Theism, and Alternative Concepts of God, edited by Thomas Schärtl, Christian Tapp and Veronika Wegener, 211-25. Münster: Aschendorff.
—. 2016c. “God as Person — Religious Psychology and Metaphysical Understanding”, in Rethinking the Concept of a Personal God: Classical Theism, Personal Theism, and Alternative Concepts of God, edited by Thomas Schärtl, Christian Tapp and Veronika Wegener, 227-41. Münster: Aschendorff.
—. 2017. “The Divine Attributes and Non-personal Conceptions of God”. Topoi 36, no. 4: 609-21.
Brunner, Emil. 1949. The Christian Doctrine of God: Dogmatics, Vol. 1. Translated by Olive Wyon. Lodon: Lutterworth Press.
Buckareff, Andrei A., and Yujin Nagasawa, eds. 2016. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Davies, Brian. 2006. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil. London: Continuum.
—. 2008. “Is God a Moral Agent?”. In Whose God? Which Tradition? The Nature of Belief in God, edited by Dewi Z. Phillips, 97–122. Aldershot: Ashgate.
—. 2011. Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil. New York, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Davis, Stephen T. 1983. Logic and the Nature of God. London: Macmillan.
Evans, C. S., and R. Z. Manis. 2009. Philosophy of Religion: Thinking about Faith. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Forrest, Peter. 2007. Developmental Theism: From Pure Will to Unbounded Love. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
—. 2016. “The Personal Theist Conception of God”. In Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 21–40. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Geach, Peter T. 1973. “Omnipotence”. Philosophy 48, no. 183: 7–20. doi:10.1017/S0031819100060381.
Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary S. Rosenkrantz. 2010. “Omnipotence”. In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper and Philip L. Quinn, 243–50. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnston, Mark. 2009. Saving God: Religion after Idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Leftow, Brian. 2009. Time and Eternity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
—. 2016. “Naturalistic Pantheism”. In Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 64–87. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Leslie, John. 1989. Universes. London, New York: Routledge.
Locke, John. 1979. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Martin, C. B. 1960. Religious Belief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
Martin, Michael. 1990. Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
Mawson, T. J. 2013. The Case Against Atheism. Oxford Univ. Press.
McCabe, Herbert. 1987. God Matters. London: Chapman.
Morris, Thomas V. 2001. The Logic of God Incarnate. Eugene Or.: Wipf and Stock.
Nagasawa, Yujin. 2008. “A New Defence of Anselmian Theism”. The Philosophical Quarterly 58, no. 233: 577–96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.578.x.
Owen, Huw P. 1971. Concepts of Deity. London: Macmillan.
Pike, Nelson. 1969. “Omnipotence and God’s Ability to Sin”. American Philosophical Quarterly 6, no. 3: 208–16.
Plantinga, Alvin. 1984. “Advice to Christian Philosophers”. Faith and Philosophy 1: 253–71. doi:10.5840/faithphil19841317.
Ratzinger, Cardinal J. 1990. “Concerning the Notion of Person in Theology”. Communio, no. 17: 439–53.
Rogers, Katherin A. 2000. Perfect Being Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Sweeney, Leo. 1992. Divine Infinity in Greek and Medieval Thought. New York: Lang.
van den Brink, Gijsbert. 1993. Almighty God: A Study of the Doctrine of Divine Omnipotence. Kampen: Pharos.
Webb, Clement C. J.  1971. God and Personality. London: Allen & Unwin.
Weigel, Peter. 2018. Aquinas on Simplicity: An Investigation into the Foundations of his Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Williams, Thomas. 2013. “Introduction to Classical Theism”. In Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities, edited by Jeanine Diller and Asa Kasher, 95–193. New York: Springer.