An Evolutionary Explanation for Change in Religious Institutions
Keywords:Cultural Evolution, Evolution and Religion, Cavalli Sforza, Catholic Beliefs, Pope Francis
Many attempts have been made to explain the rise of religious phenomena based on evolutionary models, which attempt to account for the way in which religion can constitute a useful system to increase the fitness of both the individual and the group. These models implicitly mean that beliefs are simply effective adaptations to the environment and in this sense they cannot be truly accepted by those who adhere to the religions in question. In this paper, I use the evolution of culture model elaborated by Cavalli Sforza to propose an approach that can explain the change of institutionalized religions over a more limited time frame than the long times of biological evolution. This model could be heuristically effective in the study of religious phenomena and could also be applicable in terms of theology and philosophy of religion. Given the limits of space, I will only try to take a few steps in this direction, trying to answer some of the major questions that arise about such an approach. In particular, one may ask whether, unlike others, the evolution of culture model applied to religions can make it possible to put into brackets - or to remain agnostic about - the value and the truth of the beliefs and precepts of the religion which is studied.
Atran, Scott. 2002. In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
Barrett, Justin L., and Jonathan A. Lanman. 2008. “The Science of Religious Beliefs”. Religion 38, no. 2: 109–24. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007.
Boyer, Pascal. 2002. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bulbulia, Joseph. 2008. “Meme Infection or Religious Niche Construction? An Adaptationist Alternative to The Cultural Maladaptationist Hypothesis”. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 20, no. 1: 67–107.
Bulbulia, Joseph, and Edward Slingerland. 2012. “Religious Studies as a Life Science”. Numen 59, no. 5–6: 564–613. doi:10.1163/15685276–12341240.
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L. 2010. L’evoluzione della cultura. Torino: Codice Edizioni.
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L., and M. W. Feldman. 1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and W. R. Bodmer. 1999. The Genetics of Human Populations. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and M. W. Feldman. 1973. “Cultural versus biological inheritance: phenotypic transmission from parents to children. (A theory of the effect of parental phenotypes on children’s phenotypes)”. American Journal of Human Genetics 25, no. 6: 618–37.
Charlesworth, Brian, and Deborah Charlesworth. 2017. Evolution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Doudna, Jennifer A., and Samuel H. Sternberg. 2017. A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Douthat, Ross. 2018. To Change the Church: Pope Francis and the Future of Catholicism. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Dreher, Rod. 2017. The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation. New York, NY: Penguin.
Gissis, Snait B., and Eva Jablonka. 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holldobler, Bert, and Edward O. Wilson. 2010. The Leafcutter Ants: Civilization by Instinct. New York, NY: W W Norton & Co Inc.
Irons, William. 2001. “Religion as a Hard-to-fake Sign of Commitment”. In Evolution and the capacity for commitment, edited by Randolph M. Nesse, 290–309. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Johnson, Dominic, and Jesse Bering. 2006. “Hand of God, Mind of Man: Punishment and Cognition in the Evolution of Cooperation”. Evolutionary Psychology 4: 219–33.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Univ. Of Chicago Press.
Moore, David S. 2015. The Developing Genome: An Introduction To Behavioral Epigenetics. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
Norenzayan, Ara, Azim F. Shariff, Will M. Gervais, Aiyana K. Willard, Rita A. McNamara, Edward Slingerland, and Joseph Henrich. 2016. “The Cultural Evolution of Prosocial Religions”. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39, no. 1. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14001356.
O’Collins, Gerald S. J., and Mario S. J. Farrugia. 2014. Catholicism: The Story of Catholic Christianity. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Powell, Russell, and Steve Clarke. 2012. “Religion as an Evolutionary Byproduct: A Critique of the Standard Model”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63, no. 3: 457–86.
Purzycki, Benjamin G., and Richard Sosis. 2010. “Religious Concepts as Necessary Components of the Adaptive Religious System”. In The Nature of God: Evolution and Religion, edited by Ulrich Frey, 37–59. Marburg: Tectum Verlag.
—. 2010. “The Religious System as Adaptive: Cognitive Flexibility, Public Displays, and Acceptance”. In The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, edited by Eckart Voland and Wulf Schiefenhövel, 243–56. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Sanderson, Stephen K. 2008. “Adaptation, Evolution, and Religion”. Religion 38: 141–56.
Sosis, Richard. 2005. “Does Religion Promote Trust? The Role of Signaling, Reputation, and Punishment”. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 1: 1–30.
Sosis, Richard, and Eric R. Bressler. 2003. “Cooperation and Commune Longevity: A Test of the Costly Signaling Theory of Religion”. Cross-cultural Research 37, no. 2: 211–39.
Stark, Rodney. 2011. The Triumph of Christianity: How the Jesus Movement Became the World’s Largest Religion. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Vollert, Cyril. 1951. “Humani Generis and the Limits of Theology”. Theology 12, no. 1: 3–23.
Wilson, David S. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago, IL: Univ. Of Chicago Press.
Wood, Connor, and John H. Shaver. 2018. “Religion, Evolution, and the Basis of Institutions: The Institutional Cognition Model of Religion”. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 2, no. 2: 1–20. doi:10.26613/esic.2.2.89.